September 29, 2002

 

Activists Burn Copies Of Subversion Law Plan In

Hong Kong

 

About 15 pro-democracy activists on

Sunday burned copies of a proposal for a new

anti-subversion law outside Hong Kong's government headquarters.

 

"Shame on the Hong Kong government," the protesters

chanted during a march to the building. "Freedom of

expression cannot be deprived!"

 

They later dispersed peacefully.

 

In a proposal unveiled Tuesday, the government

suggested giving police broader investigative powers

and setting harsher penalties for serious crimes

against the state, including treason, secession,

sedition and subversion. The maximum penalty would be

life imprisonment.

 

One of the activists, Rev. Fung Chi-wood, accused the government of misleading the public by downplaying the "draconian law."

 

The report on the proposed law "is very vague," Fung

said. "We are extremely worried that Hong Kong will

become a city without freedom of expression."

 

Fung is among those who have long feared that the new

law could be used to erode the freedoms that set

capitalist Hong Kong apart from the Chinese mainland.

 

In the face of increasing criticism, Hong Kong's top

security official, Regina Ip, said in a radio

interview Saturday that she would "study" the

possibility of extending the time period for the

public to respond to the proposed law.

 

"I'm still not convinced, but I'll study this," Ip

said.

 

Ip also tried to allay fears that the anti-subversion

law would be used to curb press freedom. The law

proposes outlawing the "unauthorized and damaging"

disclosure of state secrets, even if they were

illegally obtained by a third party and leaked to the

media.

 

Ip said she believed the media could judge whether the information was obtained legally.

 

Ip told lawmakers earlier that the government hoped to

see the new legislation enacted by next July, after

the government announced that Hong Kong had to push

ahead with the widely unpopular legislation after five

years as part of China.

 

Top officials had stressed that the law would be

rarely used and would not violate international human

rights treaties or civil liberties promised to Hong

Kong when the former British colony was returned to

China in 1997.